This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here     

Do hotel brands still matter?

Bookmark and Share

 

13 December 2010
By Patrick Mayock
Editor-in-Chief
patrick@hotelnewsnow.com

Story Highlights
  • HotelNewsNow.com’s special report examines the relevancy of brands.
  • As many as 60 new brands have been introduced during the past six years.
  • “It’s not that brands are unimportant, they’re just less important,” said Peter Yesawich, chairman and CEO of Ypartnership.

Do hotel brands still matter? The answers to that question vary, not surprisingly, depending on whom you ask. Query the head of a major hotel chain, and he’d tell you absolutely they do. Pick the brain of an industry pundit or academic, and they’d argue the opposite, citing commoditization and consumers’ adherence to price.

But perhaps the answers aren’t as important as the question itself. Every time a new brand is announced, some within the industry roll their eyes and dispute its necessity or need. But lately, those individual protests and the underlying questions of brand validity have reached a boiling point.

Exacerbating the debate is the influx of new brands hitting the market. Hotel veteran John Russell, who during the past five years has personally launched two new brands, put the tally at 35—in the past 35 months. Bjorn Hanson of New York University’s Preston Robert Tisch Center for Hospitality, Tourism, and Sports Management has his own strong estimate: 60 new brands announced in the past six years. That includes brands that were announced as though they would be the first in a series of hotels, with at least some planned future development in the United States.

Such a noticeable bump in supply—and competition—is a tough pill to swallow for cash-strapped hoteliers. 

But there exist other sources of heat fueling this conflict. Peter Yesawich, chairman and CEO of Ypartnership, suggested two in particular.

1. Price and value

First, the macroeconomic decline experienced during the Great Recession has shifted consumer priorities like never before. This is the dawning of the age of price-consciousness and value, Yesawich said. Travelers are more likely to seek out hotel rooms based on rate rather than the name emblazoned on the side of the box.

 

Peter Yesawich
chairman and CEO
Ypartnership

Ypartnership’s 2010 Portrait of American Travelers survey confirmed as much. Out of a list of 30-some attributes that influence booking decisions, respondents rated “room rate” the most important—followed closely by “value for the price.” Where falls the “brand name of the hotel/resort?” You’d have to look further down the list at No. 14. (Notable was the attribute that ranked a spot higher: “free Internet access from guestrooms.”)

 

Complementing this shift in purchasing behavior is the accessibility of price-comparison shopping with online travel agencies and meta-search engines. Hoteliers have long bemoaned the evils of websites like Expedia, Priceline and Travelocity, which allow consumers to search and buy rooms based solely on price. Industry professionals play victim in return, crying foul over allegations of unwelcomed commoditization of their vastly diverse product offerings.

“People say, ‘I didn’t stay at a Marriott or Holiday Inn, I stayed at an Expedia hotel,’” said STR co-founder Randy Smith during the keynote address at this year’s Cornell Hospitality Research Summit.

2. The rise of gen Y

The second factor fueling the debate is a fundamental shift in demographics. “As the next generation of travelers begin to impact the business … one of the things that’s very clear to us is that their brand preferences differ quite dramatically,” Yesawich said.

“Millennials”—the term has become something of a dirty word in the hotel industry, representing an overly demanding workforce that requires coddling and adherence to personal preference. But workplace issues aside, this demographic also represents an increasingly powerful segment of travelers.

They’re fickle. They demand authentic guest experience. And above all else, “millennials are less brand loyal,” Yesawich said last month during a panel at the AH&LA Hospitality Leadership Forum.

What now?

Where do we go from here? Do we through in the towel, halt development and shut down the creative outlets behind some of the most exciting new brand concepts?

Of course not.

If Yesawich was clear on anything, it was the fact that brands still matter. “It’s not that brands are unimportant,” he said, pausing for emphasis. “They’re just less important.”  

So while the hotel industry must keep churning the wheels of progress, it must do so smarter. It must take into account the changing landscape and the changing needs of travelers.

This special report aims to point the hotel industry in the right direction. It starts at the beginning, exploring the creation of the brand in an attempt to understand the sudden swell of them. It then examines how to differentiate brands in what many consider an overcrowded, commoditized market. Finally, it casts its vision forward, offering some predictions on what the future holds for brands and their place in the industry. 

Bookmark and Share





5 Comments
Show All

15 December 2010 at 11:39 PM Central Time
In response to: Do hotel brands still matter?
DESIBHAI commented:
The only brand that seem to bring revenue are hilton,IHG,BW,LA Quinta, Comfort in choice. Joining the wyndhams,choice seem to be wasting money,these same properties as independant should do just fine. How can discarded properties join wyndham and compete their previous name by puting more powder and clothes on top, but we cant make fools out of our sophisticated customers. Not only that but not being able to acheive a higher rate and after paying the same royalty and giving food,rewards, what will we have left to survive. YES one thing is liquidated damages and lawyer tension. Wyndhams and choice really need to have ethics which the feeling we get is when we could feed you we fed you once we become handicapped you ruin us with LD'S and lawsuit tensions leaving such a sour relationship hope it does not turn up detremental some day. We could write a whole book on this subject but lets leave it to this to acheive a healthy relationship and hope the Wyndhams and choice reservations wouls increase. About time consumers will realise that these hotels have great rooms. These days Cadillac owners have more confidence and have started appreciating Honda similarly given time and blessings these sophisticated customers will start appreciating the older stronger properties.

15 December 2010 at 2:30 PM Central Time
In response to: Do hotel brands still matter?
Vicki Patel commented:
True, hotel branding is not essential, the only problem is to convince Lenders who insist on a flag.

14 December 2010 at 10:25 AM Central Time
In response to: Do hotel brands still matter?
lbernste commented:
It was an easy mistake: believing that customer loyalty was the end result of loyalty programs. Many hotel brands focused on loyalty programs rather than building relevant, experiential differentiation into their products. And while the numbers increased, it all looked good. But, in reality most hotel loyalty programs did little more than bribe guests to behave in a way that resembled loyalty. The one major hold-out, Fairmont, used their program strictly to reinforce their brand promise and extend the experience outside of the properties. OTC's and hotel on-line booking engines ripped the clothes off the emperor, highlighting in a wicki-leak fashion the lack of experiential difference and the massive and random pricing inconsistencies among and within brands and products. They then added insult to injury in a perfectly predictable move to add their own rewards programs to tear asunder any last strands of umbilical relationship between travelers and hotel brands. The next move will not be, in my opinion, what Randy Smith refers to (change in vernacular), but rather a real branding of hotels by the OTC's. "Expedia" branded hotels, in three or four segments will do serious damage to everybody else. It won't take much to convince owners to take down their current sign and put up an Expedia sign, for example, given the preemptive advantage Expedia would have of delivering room nights. Hotel brands should be responding to this inevitability right now by building relevant differentiated experiences that are noticeable, valuable and unique.

14 December 2010 at 7:40 AM Central Time
In response to: Do hotel brands still matter?
Patrick Goff commented:
In Europe where brands make up only 25-20% of the available beds they have always had less importance than in the US. My belief is that when they stopped owning the properties they lost the plot, cedeing control to their franchisees. It is noticeable that brand leader Premier Inns in the UK is able to pioneer green eco-measure in its hotels beacuse it owns all 526 properties and can nail down the needed construction and operational criteria in a way that has increased their bottom line profit 6.6% in 2010. Read about them on hoteldesigns.net



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)

Comments that include links or URLs will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.



Follow HotelNewsNow.com on Twitter Subscribe to the HotelNewsNow.com RSS Feed Connect with HotelNewsNow.com on LinkedIn