This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here     

UPDATE: Innkeepers responds to Cerberus

Bookmark and Share

 

02 September 2011
By Shawn A. Turner
Finance Editor
Shawn@HotelNewsNow.com

Story Highlights
  • A statement from Innkeepers reads that Cerberus and Chatham, by walking away, are trying to gain "leverage" in renegotiating the price of the deal.
  • Chatham and Cerberus cited an unidentified “material adverse effect” as the basis for their abandonment of the deal.
  • In its lawsuit, Innkeepers said Chatham and Cerberus left the deal in an attempt to gain greater leverage in renegotiating terms of the agreement.

UPDATE: 8:45 a.m.: Innkeepers USA Trust has issued a response to Cerberus' statement found below:

“The binding commitment letter contains no 'market' material adverse event clause.  As was stated in the complaint, Cerberus’ and Chatham’s purported termination is nothing more than a calculated effort to apply leverage upon the Debtors and their constituents to renegotiate the terms of the parties’ binding contract.  Regardless of their motives, one thing is clear:  Cerberus and Chatham are not excused from their obligations under the plain terms of the Binding Commitment Letter and Term Sheet,” Innkeepers said.


REPORT FROM THE U.S.—Cerberus Capital Management has responded to a lawsuit filed by Innkeepers USA Trust over Cerberus’ and partner Chatham Lodging Trust’s decision to abandon their deal for 64 Innkeepers hotels.

Cerberus’ statement reads: “The sponsors have asserted that a material adverse effect as defined in the definitive documents has occurred. The sponsors will establish the basis for their position in an appropriate manner. In addition, the bid procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court provide that in the event the contract is terminated other than as permitted by the contract, the sole and exclusive remedy for the company is to retain the Sponsors' (US)$20 million deposit. As a result, the company has no basis to seek either specific performance or damages beyond the deposit.”

Chatham and Cerberus cited an unidentified “material adverse effect” in justifying their decision to walk away from the deal.

Bankrupt Innkeepers this week responded in court. 

Deals Ad Will Appear Here

“Cerberus’ and Chatham’s purported termination is nothing more than a calculated effort to apply leverage upon the debtors and their constituents to renegotiate the terms of the parties’ binding contract,” Innkeepers said in the complaint filed Monday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York. “Regardless of their motives, one thing is clear: Cerberus and Chatham are not excused from their obligations under the plain terms of the Binding Commitment Letter and Term Sheet.”

Innkeepers is seeking a court order that would force Chatham and Cerberus to reinstate the commitment letter or pay damages, which could exceed the US$20-million deposit on the acquisitions. Officials at Innkeepers and Chatham did not return messages left for comment this morning.
 

Bookmark and Share





0 Comments
Show All



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)

Comments that include links or URLs will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.



Follow HotelNewsNow.com on Twitter Subscribe to the HotelNewsNow.com RSS Feed Connect with HotelNewsNow.com on LinkedIn