Share
Bookmark and Share

The fallout from an OTA lockout
 

02 December 2009 8:47 AM
By Shawn A. Turner
Associate News Editor
Shawn@HotelNewsNow.com
 

REPORT FROM THE U.S.—Sixteen months into their dismissal from the Web sites of online travel agencies, hotels in Columbus, Georgia, appear to be holding up relatively well.

It was August 2008 when hotels in Columbus disappeared from the OTA sites, and customers wanting to book a room in the city began to be rerouted to Phenix City, Alabama—a city about a mile and a half away from Columbus. But Columbus’ absence hasn’t been the drag on performance that might have been expected.

According to the most recent Smith Travel Research data for October, occupancy was 58.6 percent, unchanged from a year ago; revenue per available room was US$44.33, down 4.9 percent; and average daily rate, meanwhile, was US$75.69, also down 4.9 percent.

The U.S., however, saw larger year-over-year percentage decreases in all three metrics than did Columbus, which had higher occupancy to boot. Total U.S. occupancy was 58.1 percent, down 6.2 percent; RevPAR declined 13.8 percent to US$66.82; and ADR fell to US$99.08, a decrease of 8.2 percent.

  Occupancy  ADR RevPAR
Columbus, Georgia  58.6% US$75.69 US$44.33
Phenix City, Alabama 56.5% US$62.53  US$35.33
Total U.S. 58.1% US$99.08  US$66.82
Source: STR

So what’s the secret to the hoteliers’ ability to mitigate the decreases in these key measures of hotel performance? Apparently, it’s something they want to keep secret.

Hotel reaction

“We’re probably not going to share our strategy,” said Teresa Ferguson, director of communications and public relations for La Quinta Inns and Suites. “It’s working, so why would we share?” Attempts to reach executives at several other hotels doing business in Columbus were not successful.

There are, however, hotels that have gone without the OTAs for longer than 16 months and also claim to have had success.

Scott Snyder, GM of the 63-room Colony Inn, bristled at the idea of using the OTAs to generate business. He said his hotel is usually about two-thirds full most nights.

“We don’t do anything with any of those people,” he said, referring to the OTAs. “We don’t and won’t.” He added he refuses to pay a commission to an outside firm to generate business he can generate on his own.

He attributed the Colony Inn’s success in part to its proximity to a U.S. military base in Fort Benning, Georgia, which is located about 12 miles from Columbus. “We get people coming to visit soldiers,” he said.

Generating business also hasn’t been a problem for the Efficiency Lodge in Columbus, which has never been listed on an OTA. Manager Alexandra Henry credited her hotel’s billboarding strategy as playing a part in keeping more than 100 of the hotel’s 120 rooms filled on an average day.

Henry, though, wasn’t referring to the “billboard effect” used in a recent Cornell University study that found hotels generally get more reservations when listed on an OTA.

Read “How OTAs boost bookings on your own Web site.”

No, she was referring to the actual billboard facing the highway outside the hotel.

Source of the dispute

Like multiple other municipalities across the U.S., Columbus filed suit against the OTAs alleging the companies have not remitted the full amount of taxes that are owed. Where this case differs from the rest, said Expedia’s VP for government affairs Brent Thompson, is that the city enjoined the OTAs from selling rooms in the city. The city has since filed another suit in an attempt to force the city to be relisted online.

“They kind of chased us out of town, and now they’re suing us to bring us back in town,” Thompson said. “They filed suit last month (October) asking us to relist. Sorry, I can’t help but chuckle.”

Neal Pope, lead attorney for the city of Columbus, said the OTAs have only been remitting taxes based on the reduced rate at which the room is sold, and not the full room rate, which he says is required. Thompson said Expedia has remitted all the taxes it owes.

Because of the amount of money and business that is at stake, Pope said the courtroom battles have been intense.


Page: 1 | 2

Bookmark and Share

4 Comments
Show All

07 December 2009 at 4:54 AM EST
In response to: The fallout from an OTA lockout
DAS_NYC commented:
OTA influence is not declining. The Columbus GA Market is not one that a typical traveller would seek out assistance planning a vacation thru an OTA. In this case, both business and leisure travellers would depend heavily on word of mouth. In leiu of an OTA presence or for those "passing through", top of mind awareness of a brand would probably do the trick. (Boy do I miss the Holidome of my youth) In the case of destination vacation markets, especially places that are "once in a lifetime" trips (and are typically of a significant cost to the traveller), OTA's will remain dominant. A smart hotelier in a destination market (both brand and independent) would use OTA's as an aquisition tool for new quests. OTA's should be the billboard piquing the potential guest's attention. At this point, many guests will look at the "freshest produce" and more than likely will continue their research from other online resources. A smart hotel leverage this search space in the consumers decision making process and reinforce customer's choice to "buy me" and even more so "buy directly from me is even smarter". The challenge is their are many places this message needs to be managed: PPC, image and copy, smart pricing, parity, and in some cases richer deals for "members", actively managing their customer feedback thru sites like tripadvisor. Finally, the key to creating direct purchase loyalty is delivering to their guests what was promised and remembering to invite the guest back. Failing to make all the pistons fire smoothly would exponentially decrease the effectiveness of what the marketing OTA's do for hotels, and surely won't make the margins worth it. Effectively doing the details, will leverage the aquisitional margins paid to the OTA, and will mean loyal direct customers and higher long term profits. Still, even the most successful hoteliers will lose customers to the OTA path. More than likely, when a guest does book thru the OTA, instead of hotel direct, the guest either wanted the security of the OTA behind them in case there was a problem (which means the Hotel didn't do a good enough job on reinforcing why to buy the hotel), or the pricing was out of parity, or even worse, their call center/website/front desk was unable to perform the reservation making task.

03 December 2009 at 10:47 AM EST
In response to: The fallout from an OTA lockout
Anonymous commented:
People forget that the influence of the OTAs is declining significantly in the face of continued growth of social media/peer review websites. Most people today often look at a hotel review (i.e. selecting the Top 20 hotels in a city) website and then search for rates & availability. In the past, the OTAs were the only option for getting a broad overview of hotels in a given destination. This is no longer the case.

02 December 2009 at 12:28 PM EST
In response to: The fallout from an OTA lockout
RockCheetah commented:
The critical issue that dictates the impact of losing access to the OTA channel is the destination's market segmentation mix. Columbus, Georgia has not seen a dramatic falloff in business for several reasons: 1) It is a regional destination (predominantly a drive market) 2) It has a relatively stronger mix of corporate versus leisure business (top attraction is National Infantry Museum) 3) No 4 or 5 star hotel inventory Destinations that are more reliant on attracting leisure business from a national and international stage, especially those with a strong portfolio of upscale properties that attract more a discretionary travel spend would see a greater degree of impact. Columbus, GA hotel business was never highly reliant on consumer leisure travel demand, and as a result, traffic generated through OTA sites was minimal. That is also exactly the reason why Columbus was removed from the OTA sites and destinations like Anaheim, CA remain available despite similar hotel merchant tax verdicts. Bottom line, destinations that do not currently see a significant portion of their business sourced through the OTA channel would not see a significant drop in demand and would have the best opportunity to fill the gap from other segments. Destinations seeing a comparatively higher ratio of business sourced through the OTAs would see a much greater impact and face a larger obstacle to replace room demand through other channels. These markets would be doubly challenged as they would also tend to be more reliant on group and meetings business - segments that have faced their own serious issues, making them unlikely prospects as new sources of hotel demand. It would be a fascinating case study to measure the impact of removing a major leisure destination from the OTAs for an extended period. Would business simply shift to supplier-direct channels, or divert to other destinations? If the destination business cratered, the position of the OTAs would be strengthened dramatically, causing hotels and destinations to lose negotiating power. However, if the business impact was minimal, the OTAs would suddenly be marginalized and lose negotiating power with the hotels and destinations. Neither the destinations, nor the OTAs would be willing to test that scenario in fear of the potential results. If either outcome was clear, the impact would be dramatic and permanently change the hotel distribution landscape. Now THAT would be fallout from an OTA lockout...

02 December 2009 at 11:39 AM EST
In response to: The fallout from an OTA lockout
Anonymous commented:
The most interesting fact to me is that when ALL hotels in an area are not listed, then the impact to overall revenues, in my opinion, would be nil. People are still going to visit Columbus, they just may have to search harder for hotels. However, if some hotels were listed and some were not, then that's when the hotels not listed would be at a disadvantage, especially the independents.



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)
Protected by FormShield
Refresh
Listen
Please enter the characters shown on the image


Enter the characters you see in the box above, then click submit to post your comment

HotelNewsNow.com encourages reader participation. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.

Comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.