Share
Bookmark and Share

Dealing with negative guest feedback
 

22 July 2009 7:23 AM
By Stacey Mieyal Higgins
Managing News Editor
stacey@hotelnewsnow.com
 

Editor’s note: A recent discussion topic on LinkedIn about dealing with negative comments on TripAdvisor led to the development of this story, which  uses follow-up comments from the LinkedIn Hotel Industry Professionals Worldwide group members (with permission), e-mails and phone interviews with other sources.

INTERNATIONAL REPORT—The significance of TripAdvisor and other guest feedback forums cannot be underestimated in this age of online hotel shopping.

How a hotel deals with what guests say is the most important aspect, according to operators and consultants.

Edward Perry

“The issue of hotel review sites is the hottest topic for hoteliers right now,” said Edward Perry, senior director of e-commerce for WorldHotels and secretary for the Hotel Electronic Distribution Network Association. “It truly has the ability to directly impact the level of business a hotel gets.”

PhocusWright’s Consumer Travel Report supports Perry’s theory: The majority of travelers (50 percent) indicated that traveler reviews on online travel agencies were slightly to very influential in travel planning. However, this means that sites such as Expedia, Travelocity and Orbitz hold more weight with online shoppers than traveler review sites (33 percent), such as TripAdvisor (owned by Expedia) and TravelPost.

It is important to point out that the latter group causes more anxiety for hoteliers, it seems—particularly when it comes to unsubstantiated negative comments from “guests.”

Marcel M. Andeweg, group GM for Alisa Hotels in Accra, Ghana, said he followed up on an extremely bad guest experience posted to TripAdvisor, but got nowhere with the author or TripAdvisor.

“The motivation was that it would be contradictory to (TripAdvisor’s) policy of integrity,” Andeweg said. “… I was left with the distinct feeling that they thought I was making it all up.”

So, what’s a hotelier to do? At the very least, the guest feedback sites need to be monitored.

At least one person per hotel should be responsible for keeping a watchful eye on all social media tools and review customer responses at least once a week, Perry said. If a property is too large or there is no one to keep up with it, there is the possibility of using a third-party manager to provide reports on customer responses, including services from TripAdvisor.

True or false, positive or negative, hotels should use TripAdvisor manager tools to reply to feedback, said Alex Bufton, key account manager, EMEA, InterContinental Hotels Group. “It shows integrity and the fact that you are listening to your consumers. … The vast majority of people (who) use TripAdvisor as a decision support tool will recognize this too. Let the consumer decide which category the author fits into and how much emphasis should be placed on it.”

To write a management response to a review on TripAdvisor:

1. Type the name of the accommodation, restaurant or attraction in the search box at the top of the home page.

2. In the search results, click the name of your property to go to its detail page.

3. Scroll down to the “Do your own” section at the bottom of the page.

4. Click the Owner's Page link in this section.

5. On the Owner's Page, click “Respond to a review” and fill out the response form.

Andeweg suggested that feedback sites could address feedback validity with the same format as Booking.com by asking those that booked through the site to post a comment after their stays. By doing so it becomes “impartial advice” from “real guests,” according to Booking.com.

“A site like TripAdvisor can do the same,” Andeweg said. “They are a member of the Expedia.com family with numerous Web sites providing booking opportunities in a large number of hotels. Even when hotels are not affiliated with Expedia.com or its subsidiaries, they can still be booked when the hotel is represented in the GDS. … The technology is there, as proven not only by other booking engines, but by other sites such as eBay. You purchase through eBay and your transaction becomes complete after sending feedback.”



Bookmark and Share

4 Comments
Show All

13 August 2009 at 4:10 PM EST
In response to: Dealing with negative guest feedback
Renier Milan, COO, Avalon Report commented:
Since 2005, Avalon Report has delivered feedback to subscribers regarding key site reviews. We have always included major OTA's (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline, Hotels.com) as well as review sites like TripAdvisor and Travelpost (the review arm of Kayak/Sidestep now delivered as reviews on BING). We have always believed the emphasis by time-impoverished hoteliers needs to be on sites where consumers book their rooms. Additionally, the sites we monitor also provide formalized rating systems rather than just commentary. This allows our subscribers to compare their 'market share of guest satisfaction' to their competitive set, much in the same way a consumer is doing it by comparison shopping. While sites like Facebook and YouTube post impressive numbers, less that 1% of the traffic on those sites is there for travel information. Those that are eventually migrate to more specialized sites to further their research and, eventually, to OTA's for comparison of pricing, quality and ratings. Accordingly, you are right to say the impact of OTA sites has 'more weight' in generating revenue. Anyone interested in further information on the issue may feel free to contact me, rmilan@avalonreport.com. I'd be happy to provide information regarding the sites that are critical to monitor and manage. For further information on our monitoring product, see www.avalonreport.com.

29 July 2009 at 10:55 AM EST
In response to: Dealing with negative guest feedback
reviewanalyst commented:
We place a great deal of focus on TripAdvisor, and with good reason. However, do not forget that reviews are posted on more than a dozen other major Online Travel Sites, and some of them also allow for management responses (including Expedia). Even more important, hoteliers need to pay attention to reviews because sometimes the reviewers make mistakes. Classic example is a review that has nothing but great things to say about their stay, but then only give a 0 or 1 star rating. This is usually a user input error, but it has a severe negative impact on the hotel's average rating for the respective site, and it can happen on any of them. What about blog entries, twitter, youtube, and flickr? User Generated Content (UGC) can easily be found from these sources as well. The challenge comes in making the monitoring process more efficient. Sure, you can subscribe to updates from almost every one of them, but now you're getting individual updates from more than 15 different channels. Tools are however available to help combine all this data into a single point of reference. See www.reviewanalyst.com for one such example.

28 July 2009 at 11:49 AM EST
In response to: Dealing with negative guest feedback
GuestBookCEO commented:
There is an alternative provided by GuestBook which enables hotels to restrict reviews to only those guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. For more information, see http://guestbookhotels.com

27 July 2009 at 4:15 PM EST
In response to: Dealing with negative guest feedback
Century House commented:
We have had good luck using similiar style feedback with TA. Have you any idea how long TA keeps reviews posted good or negative ?



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)
Protected by FormShield
Refresh
Listen
Please enter the characters shown on the image


Enter the characters you see in the box above, then click submit to post your comment