Revenue-management best practices have failed
 
Revenue-management best practices have failed
23 MAY 2014 7:28 AM

Revenue managers should rethink traditional best practices in response to changes in the dynamic hotel industry, according to panelists.


REPORT FROM THE U.S.—The traditional revenue-management best practices have failed, leading processes to change from a static to nimble approach, according to panelists on a webinar hosted by the Hospitality Sales and Marketing Association International University, Hotel News Now and STR, HNN’s parent company.
 
The way in which customers shop has changed, panelists said during the webinar titled “Revenue & yield management ‘best practices’ have failed.” Therefore, best-available-rate pricing is in its final act of the revenue-management play.
 
Tom Botts, executive VP and chief customer officer for Denihan Hospitality Group, said best-available-rate pricing often offers little value to customers but makes hoteliers “feel good.” Customers today are shopping based on price, he said.
 
Ash Kapur, VP of hospitality revenue management and distribution for Starwood Capital Group, agreed consumers shop by lowest available rates, but online travel agencies aren’t the ones to blame.
 
“Why blame them? They’ve created a marketplace,” he said. “Shoppers are used to going to marketplaces. … We cannot change customer-shopping behavior of going to these sites. What we should focus on intrinsically is our own digital booking experience.”
 
Kapur said the guest experience doesn’t start when guests arrive at the hotel. It starts pre-arrival, when they begin to shop. Hoteliers should be mindful of that when it comes to their own booking processes, he said.
 
Intermediaries are focusing on a better customer experience when it comes to their websites, and this is an area where hoteliers could be missing the mark, Kapur said.
 
“We as hoteliers are capping our own investment in technology and questioning (return on investment), but we are happy paying commissions to intermediaries who instead are using those commissions to improve technology,” he said.
 
Patrick Bosworth, CEO and co-founder of Duetto, said commissions have risen 37% compared to a 20% increase in revenues, citing research commissioned last year by the Hospitality Asset Managers Association. He said intermediaries are able to steal market share due to hoteliers’ mistakes. 
 
However, it’s important hoteliers don’t abandon these types of distribution channels because that would be shutting off some demand, Kapur said.
 
Revenue-management failures
Panelists said revenue managers can sometimes focus too much on historical data, concentrating on the past instead of looking toward future pace and trends.
 
“We’re showing graph after graph, trying to justify what we’re doing,” Kapur said.
 
Botts said historical data can often bear little resemblance to the market. For instance, some markets, such as  New York, experience drastic changes, which then makes the historical data a poor representation of the current reality.
 
Bosworth said revenue managers are not always viewing themselves as marketers.
 
“Marketing is inseparable from revenue management. It’s not joined at the hip, but it’s in the same silo,” he said.
 
Budgeting and forecasting also have not evolved as the hotel industry has changed, Botts said. 
 
“Budgets are often created on a sort of, ‘Hey, let’s just keep it within 2% to 3% of last year,’” he said. Short-term budget mentality can sacrifice larger and more profitable goals.
 
He said revenue managers can sometimes focus on what he refers to as the “wish it so” segmentation and mix changes.
 
“We sit in a room and say, ‘Gosh, I really want more of this.’ … So we put it in the budget, and we hope it happens,” he said. “One thing we’re starting to learn as an industry is these changes are not free. 
 
“Hope is clearly not a strategy.”
 
What to do
Panelists said revenue managers have to be nimble.
 
Kapur suggested implementing dynamic pricing. Rates shouldn’t be restricted to a few levels. Rate plans should also be decoupled, he said, and rooms should be priced based on demand, segment and room type.
 
Botts said it’s imperative to invest in talent. When a director of revenue management leaves, it can cost a company between $250,000 to $500,000 in revenue.
 
Beyond the right talent, platforms also need to see some investment, Botts said.
 
“OTAs will not stop investing in functionality, nor should we,” he said.
 
Customer relationship management used to be purely within hotels on index cards, he said. Now hoteliers are allowing OTAs and others to enter into the guest relationship.
 
Failure to adapt will leave hoteliers dependent on OTAs, Botts said. Budgeting and forecasting policies and procedures need to be updated to deal with new realities in the distribution landscape.
 
For instance, revenue managers should consider measuring the gross-operating-profit impact of projected marketing scenarios by creating a baseline of full-year data by segment and channel. One way to do this is to increase interactive and media online marketing spend based on expected ROI.
 
Revenue managers can also yield differently, Botts said. He noted several ways to do this:
  • offer flexible differentials between room types;
  • ensure unique offers are priced close to OTA parity rates;
  • compare nonrefundable rates with OTA net rates; and
  • ensure the true cost of distribution and marketing is included in every decision.
 
At the end of the day, “consumers are willing to pay a little more if they perceive it’s a good deal,” Botts said.
 

6 Comments

  • JackMeredith May 28, 2014 4:45 AM

    Great Article and 100% on track. It's up to us (hotels) to manage the channels, including special attention to OTAs.

  • David May 28, 2014 5:45 AM

    Rory, you are under estimating the last part of Ash's comment: "What we should focus on intrinsically is our own digital booking experience.” It sounds to me like he is saying that if hotel owners and companies focus on providing the best value and experience on their own sites, then it really doesn't matter what OTAs do. I tend to agree with that philosophy, however the biggest obstacle is the fact that OTAs have a marketplace that includes virtually all brands whereas the brands themselves have fallen short in that regard. That roomkey site doesn't cut it.

  • sanjibecole777 May 28, 2014 11:18 AM

    What I collect from the above article: *Intermediaries are focusing on a better customer experience when it comes to their websites *Marketing is inseparable from revenue management *OTAs will not stop investing in functionality, nor should we. *Revenue managers have to be nimble. Al these prcisely explain the role of revenue management demands diverse spectrum of focus on hotel business. Functionality will only come if revenue managers have hands on operational experience in Hotel or minimum few years managerial role in operation so that they can be nimble by using their qualitative expertise and acumen to transform in their RMS system. At the same time Department heads( Room division and F&B) will face the future dilema in their role because they need to hone in their RMS skill. Third party will always be there and we should use them as distribution channel. Giving bargain power to them shows our lack of understanding of functionality.

  • shawnturner May 29, 2014 5:05 AM

    EDITOR'S NOTE: David's comment is referring to a post that was removed from the site for violating Hotel News Now's message board policy. --- Shawn A. Turner

  • pmahler May 30, 2014 3:58 PM

    Revenue management is still the most inefficient practice at most properties. It doesn't take much to outperform the curve at this point, in the future it will. It's exciting times for those in this field.

  • Eduardo Alvarez July 9, 2015 8:24 AM

    What a Revenue strategy should consider, Customers are no longer incommunicated they have reviews, rankings and of course someone who may comment thru social contacts about their last experience or which hotel or restaurant to look for,in the go. For the past 25 years all travelers where looking for well known brand as of "Standarization Age that We were educated" commands. Now We are looking to a market willing to experience and try new things and non branded "standarized" experiences no matter if this travel is for bussiness or leisure. Independent Hotels might have now a little more chances to get a bigger slice of the market by selling this "NON standarized experiences" And Revenue should go the same way looking for more innovative ways to distribute not prices, experiences. Working in collaboration with OPS, and Marketing We should be able to put something in the market that make a difference and matters to our customers.

Comments that include blatant advertisements or links to products or company websites will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Hotel News Now or its parent company, STR and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.