This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here     

Jeff Higley
Editorial Director


Patrick Mayock
Editor-in-Chief


Jan Freitag
Senior VP, Global Development, STR


Shawn A. Turner
Finance Editor


Jason Q. Freed
News Editor-Americas


Samantha Worgull
Editorial Assistant


Elizabeth Winkle
Managing Director, STR Global


The Lobby a social network from HotelNewsNow.com
Wednesday, 09 December 2009

Bookmark and Share
After delisting, how much longer can the magic go on?
Posted by Shawn A. Turner at 12:00 AM

Last week, I wrote an article for HotelNewsNow.com, "The fallout from an OTA lockout," that basically said hotels in Columbus, Georgia, are holding up pretty well following their delisting from the sites of online travel companies like Orbitz, Expedia and Priceline.com.

I guess what I should add is that they are holding up pretty well—for now.

Our data here at Smith Travel Research shows that Columbus saw smaller year-over-year declines in occupancy, average daily rate, and revenue per available room than the U.S. in general, and had a higher occupancy percentage to boot.

But another study completed earlier this year by Columbus State University in Georgia puts Columbus’ OTA development in an entirely new perspective.

According to Dr. Andres Jauregui and Dr. Kirk Heriot, the city’s lockout from the OTA sites cost Columbus quite a bit of money in the time period from June 2008 (when the lockout started) until June 2009. Among their findings:

• The lockout has cost the city a total of US$18.6 million in direct and indirect revenues;
• hotels have lost US$9.3 million in hotel bookings;
• the city has lost US$1.4 million in hotel-related taxes and more than US$573,000 in sales tax; and
• a total of US$8.3 million in retail sales have occurred outside the city as a result of the delisting, the study alleges.

When I contacted him this week, Heriot said he and his colleague would not comment on the story.

Still, the numbers, if accurate, speak for themselves. It’s hard for me to imagine hoteliers in Columbus will continue to maintain their numbers over the long term, though I have been wrong before and probably will be again someday.

Add to the removal of the hotels from OTAs the fact that the industry is still in the midst of a big downturn, and you’ve got a recipe for disaster in Georgia.

Given the animosity I sensed on both sides when I was doing my interviewing for the piece, it’s also hard for me to imagine this is going to be resolved anytime soon. So I suppose the Columbus Marriott, La Quinta Inn Columbus Midtown and other hoteliers in the area are going to have to keep up their magic act for a while longer.



Bookmark and Share


1 Comments
Show All

11 December 2009 at 11:08 AM Central Time
In response to: After delisting, how much longer can the magic go on?
Dave H. commented:
Losing top line revenues from an OTA is not as bad as it might seem. The profit margins from such room sales are low, hotel customer loyalty generated is zero, and to think that people do or do not travel to an area based on whether the hotels in the area are listed on a given site is naive at best. Columbus should be applauded for taking a stand (ala Choice Hotels International). It would be a good time to remember that OTA intermediaries are just that. They have zero skin in the game. The hotels in Columbus will be just fine.



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)

Comments that include links or URLs will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.