This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here     

Jeff Higley
Editorial Director


Patrick Mayock
Editor-in-Chief


Jan Freitag
Senior VP, Global Development, STR


Shawn A. Turner
Finance Editor


Jason Q. Freed
News Editor-Americas


Samantha Worgull
Editorial Assistant


Elizabeth Winkle
Managing Director, STR Global


The Lobby a social network from HotelNewsNow.com
Friday, 07 January 2011

Bookmark and Share
American Airlines vs. OTAs—chutzpah or stupidity?
Posted by Patrick Mayock at 12:00 AM

Chutzpah or stupidity? Reactions to American Airlines pulling its flights from Orbitz and its affiliates 21 December have covered all ends of the spectrum—as has the analysis from the subsequent fallout from Expedia, which days later stopped selling AA flights after a months-long pricing dispute.

Chutzpah: I’m sure AA’s initial move received many “hoorahs!” from the hotel industry, which has long bemoaned the inordinate commissions charged by online travel agencies, led by Expedia. When AA pulled its flights from Orbitz, the company claimed consumers could just as easily buy tickets from its direct brand website, and AA could retain more of the profit. The airline company deserves some kudos for having the guts to stand up to Orbitz or any OTA. I don’t see many other travel companies willing to throw it all on the line.

Stupidity: Yes, consumers can just as easily buy tickets from AA.com, but that doesn’t mean they’re going to do so. The travel-buying public is conditioned to do comparison shopping on the likes of Orbitz and Expedia. Take your product off those distribution channels and you’re likely to see some business decline. (AA says its overall tickets sales have increased in both cases, at least in the short run.) About a third of Americans book their tickets on independent travel sites, according to a Yahoo! News report. But what about Southwest, you ask? Only this and other similarly sized discount air carriers can get away with selling tickets exclusively on their direct websites because they already have a reputation for offering cheaper fares.

Where does the hotel industry fit into the dispute?

It’s nice to be on the outside looking in for a change, isn’t it? But we’d be foolish not to try to draw some lessons from this whole debacle. 

Let’s just be clear: Comparing the airline industry’s distribution structure with that of the hotel industry is a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison. I won’t bore you with the details here, but those wishing to explore the issue should read this analysis from Gautam Lulla posted on Tnooz.

Now on to those lessons …

Lesson No. 1: Drive direct bookings …

A bit of a no-brainer here, but still one worth mentioning. Max Starkov at Hospitality eBusiness Strategies put it best when he wrote in an August 2010 blog, “The only viable option to drastically reduce reliance on the OTA channel is for the industry to embrace the Direct Online Channel.”

Lesson No. 2: … but don’t assume customers will flock to brand.com.

Direct bookings might be the way, the light and the truth in any hotel distribution strategy, but we can’t assume customers will always use them. Like I’ve already said, the travel-buying, value-seeking public is conditioned to shop around for any hotel/flight-related purchase.

I don’t know if AA had a well-thought-out strategy in place to drive bookings through AA.com before it pulled the plug on Orbitz, but I sure hope they did. What might that strategy look like? Again, I’ll defer to Starkov, who, along with Mariana Mechoso Safer, laid out the Top 10 Internet Marketing Resolutions for 2011 for hoteliers in a recent blog.

Lesson No. 3: The OTA endgame should be sought on the middle ground.

We all know the back-and-forth between hoteliers and the OTAs can’t continue forever. Hoteliers are either going to get very smart (doubtful, as the knee-jerk reactions to the downturn showed) about how to properly manage their room inventory, or they’ll get so frustrated (more likely) that they’ll do something drastic and pull their inventory entirely—as was the case with AA. (I suppose they could simply trudge onward in their state of victimization and continue to be bullied by unsustainable commission and pricing models.)

Despite my better judgment, I’ll throw realism to the wind and pray for that first option. While a full-out industry overthrow of OTAs might be one to share with the grandkids, the industry would be better served to use third-party distribution platforms only to drive incremental business. This is by no means a revolutionary idea. Again, the majority of us already know this.

Of course, how we go about reaching this end has yet been seen—or rather, has yet been executed. Perhaps it will take a single brave soul, boasting a bit of chutzpah and stupidity, to get the ball rolling.



Bookmark and Share


15 Comments
Show All

17 January 2011 at 7:47 PM Central Time
In response to: American Airlines vs. OTAs—chutzpah or stupidity?
lindagdavis commented:
Chutzpah and Smarts! We (hoteliers) need to drive more business through all channels of distribution. Please let hoteliers know that there are hotel direct channels such as getawaypackages.com that feature hotel direct leisure package display listings free of charge. If Hotels would compensate sales and marketing pros based on their production from All Online Channels as they do with B2B sales, their ADR's and revenue would climb online as well. Currently, most are compensated for Online sales which many consider to be OTAS only as they do not wish to be bothered with the hotel direct push which requires more time and thought...not necessarily dollars. Some hotels even consider OTA commissions to be marketing dollars!

14 January 2011 at 2:47 PM Central Time
In response to: American Airlines vs. OTAs—chutzpah or stupidity?
Holly commented:
In response, overall a good article. As someone married to the airline industry & in the hotel industry, OTA's need to remember that they're not victims, but bullies on the playground. When a company posts triple & quadruple profits, while your income sources are not, then you're obviously not innocent. I utilize the OTA's but I think if the OTA's were more transparent with customers, that their commission is sometimes triple what a travel agent would get, & they are not passing along the savings to the customer, they are doing a HUGE dis-service as well. Though I use all streams of revenue I can access, I do educate my customer every day. But SABRE's recent action in retaliation, and that is what it was, to AA, made it abundantly clear that greed is indeed the bottom line & not a thriving "Anti-competitve" atmosphere. It's like a taller kid holding a lollipop over a short kid's head in the school yard.

12 January 2011 at 6:29 AM Central Time
In response to: American Airlines vs. OTAs—chutzpah or stupidity?
Danny G commented:
Thank you for this interesting article. As someone who works high up for an OTA, i find the ongoing victimization of OTAs insulting. Why should OTAs only be there to serve business to the hotels when times are hard but be omitted from the game when the going is good? We are a business like any other and if we are relied upon for distribution when the going is bad then we should also be there when the economy is strong. The matter of fact is that we drive business to chains and individual properties that they may have never got was it not for us. They may have lost out to their competition but instead received bookings due to a competitive offer shown on the OTA site, this point is always missed or purposely ignored in this argument. When location based results is mainstream on the search engines i wonder how the hotels are going to drive business to their sites when they are not listed amongst the top 20 results in any particular destination? I guess then they are going to have to spend the marketing dollars that we do in driving sales to their hotels and wonder to themselves, "wasn't it better when we were working with the OTAs?"

11 January 2011 at 12:23 PM Central Time
In response to: American Airlines vs. OTAs—chutzpah or stupidity?
patrick commented:
Hi Scottied, Thanks for your comment. I can assure you that the editorial staff at HotelNewsNow.com never produces unique content in exchange for payment or other contributions from sponsors or advertisers. We’re one of the few, if only, industry trade publications that maintains strict adherence to an objective news philosophy. The information cited in this blog—including the commentary from Max—was the result of several phone conversations and interviews I had with various experts for an OTA special report that will run early next month. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion, and I encourage you to make your voice heard here and throughout other articles on HotelNewsNow.com. If the comments in response to this blog have shown us anything, it’s that there’s much debate and complexity surrounding this issue—something my colleagues and I hope to explore further in the aforementioned special report. Feel free to contact me directly with any other concerns at patrick@hotelnewsnow.com. Best, Patrick



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)

Comments that include links or URLs will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.



Follow HotelNewsNow.com on Twitter Subscribe to the HotelNewsNow.com RSS Feed Connect with HotelNewsNow.com on LinkedIn