2012
May
April
March
Febuary
January
2011
2010
2009
2008

Jeff Higley
Editorial Director


Patrick Mayock
News Editor-International


Jan Freitag
Senior VP, Global Development, STR


Shawn A. Turner
Finance Editor


Jason Q. Freed
News Editor-Americas



Samantha Worgull
Editorial Assistant


David Grossniklaus
STR Global Writer & Analyst


The Lobby a social network from HotelNewsNow.com
Thursday, 24 March 2011



Ashford’s acquisition strategy is one to follow
Posted by Shawn A. Turner at 12:00 AM

Jones Lang LaSalle Hotels last week confirmed that deal volume in the Americas hit US$11.9 billion a year ago. And the total is expected to reach US$13 billion this year.

Much of that activity is coming from the real-estate investment trust sector, where companies are racing to gobble up the best properties. For instance, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust alone has spent US$436.6 million since 9 September 2010 in acquiring a half dozen properties.

Granted, the hotel sector is in the midst of recovery right now so some pickup in hotel trades is to be expected. That said, these REITs would be well-served to study the measured approach to deal-making that Ashford Hospitality Trust has put in place.

Ashford was a silent observer of the initial transaction frenzy and hadn’t made any acquisitions since 2007. That all changed this month when the company led a joint-ventured purchase of the 28-hotel Highland Hospitality portfolio, which gave the REIT added exposure to the luxury chain scale and the East Coast market.


The Highland deal perfectly encapsulates Ashford’s modus operandi as it relates to acquisitions. First, Ashford seeks to leverage its existing position in order to gain a pricing advantage. In the Highland deal, Ashford and joint-venture partner Prudential Real Estate Investors purchased US$70 million in mezzanine debt in 2008. They followed that with another mezzanine position purchased at a “significant” discount to par, Ashford CEO Monty Bennett said during an 11 March conference call with analysts during which the deal’s closing was announced.

Second, Bennett told me during a telephone conversation this week that his company is looking for those hotels that are “off the radar” of potential competitors. Again, this plays into Ashford’s value-seeking strategy. It prevents the company from getting involved in bidding wars that could end with Ashford overspending for assets.

It’s a similar strategy Ashford might be putting to use next month if Whitehall Street Real Estate Funds isn’t able to restructure and retain the debt it owns on the Tharaldson portfolio of 105 hotels. Ashford owns a US$26-million slice of the mezzanine debt in that situation, too.

At the end of the day, Ashford’s No. 1 goal should be to create value for its shareholders. Keeping a close eye on a deal’s price tag is one way to do just that.



Bookmark and Share


1 Comments
Show All

29 March 2011 at 11:11 AM EST
In response to: Ashford’s acquisition strategy is one to follow
anonymous commented:
Ashford may be "gobbling" up "off the radar" hotels, but they are failing miserably at the currently owned assets. All of their cash is being focused on these acquisitions, while their pre-existing properties are being driven into the ground with lack of focus on maintaining those assets. As important to investors as growing the company size is, it is equally important to make sure your current assets continue to provide a steady stream of income. Dated Product = Declining ADR. Get out your checkbook ASH and get those capital improvement projects going...



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)
Protected by FormShield
Refresh
Listen
Please enter the characters shown on the image


Enter the characters you see in the box above, then click submit to post your comment

HotelNewsNow.com encourages reader participation. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.

Comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.