This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here     

Jeff Higley
Editorial Director


Patrick Mayock
Editor-in-Chief


Jan Freitag
Senior VP, Global Development, STR


Shawn A. Turner
Finance Editor


Jason Q. Freed
News Editor-Americas


Samantha Worgull
Editorial Assistant


Elizabeth Winkle
Managing Director, STR Global


The Lobby a social network from HotelNewsNow.com
Monday, 26 September 2011

Bookmark and Share
Global Hotel Exchange's intriguing possibilities
Posted by Jeff Higley at 12:00 AM

Is the Global Hotel Exchange the great equalizer for hotels in the hotly contested world of online travel agencies? It might not be the end all, be all, but it most definitely is a step in the right direction.

Unveiled during a news conference at last week’s Lodging Conference in Phoenix, the Global Hotel Exchange is the brainstorm of Tom and Melissa Magnuson, who are forward-looking, aggressive marketers trying to provide a less-costly answer for hotels in the online reservation arena.

The company’s news release says the Global Hotel Exchange is a worldwide trading platform introduced to provide transparent “market based pricing” to consumers, while offering global reservation/marketing services at no cost to hotels struggling with economic instability.

Blog Ad Will Appear Here

 The platform is scheduled to go live in 2012 across Internet, mobile and social networks. The company said it will provide a simple, fast and transparent way to book a room at a fair market price.

No cost
Here’s a statement in the Global Hotel Exchange PR piece that must pique the interest of hotel operators: “Hotel owners will receive worldwide marketing at no cost. There are no merchant discounts, commissions or distribution fees of any kind to hotels. Hotels will control their own rates and allocations via security extranet.”

Tom Magnuson said during the news conference that GHE will charge consumers less than US$4 per booking. That transaction cost will be transparent to consumers.

“Our No. 1 priority is to regain control of our margin, price and inventory,” he said.

Magnuson knows of what he speaks. As long-time hotel owners, he and his wife about eight years ago introduced Magnuson Hotels. That group’s website describes the company as “the world's largest independent hotel group representing nearly 2,000 independent hotel properties and resorts across North America and the UK.”

The biggest challenge
Those 2,000 or so hotels will have inventory placed on the Global Hotel Exchange from the start. The Magnusons’ biggest challenge will be to convince other brands—some of which it competed against during the past eight years—to join the GHE platform.

“What we need is support and inventory,” Tom Magnuson said in Phoenix. He added there have been favorable responses from hotel chains but declined to reveal specific names. I believe they will have a lot of interest from brands and hotel companies that are searching for ways to increase their online exposure but trying to get away from what they perceive as out-of-control costs associated with the OTAs currently operating in the hotel space. It might be a limited number of rooms to start, but it seems to me that if the GHE platform offers operators a less expensive way to gain reservations then it is worth a try.

A hotel distribution-channel study set to be released by the American Hotel & Lodging Association, STR (the parent company of HotelNewsNow.com) and the HSMAI Foundation during the next couple of weeks will reveal OTAs make up approximately 10% of the business for the about 24,500 hotels that provided data for the project. It will go into detail about the costs of the various distribution channels in an effort to educate operators about achieving the optimal distribution-channel mix of business. That mix most certainly includes OTAs. The timing of the launch of the Global Hotel Exchange isn’t coincidental—Magnuson referred to the aforementioned study during the press conference and he said he knows online reservations are at the forefront of all operators’ minds.

Marketing and distribution
Magnuson was vague about marketing plans for GHE. During the press conference he said he couldn’t divulge the plan because doing so would give away competitive advantages. It’s safe to assume that GHE won’t be anywhere close to the same league as existing OTAs when it comes to a marketing budget. It’s also pretty clear that GHE will utilize the ever-expanding world of social media as a major distribution vehicle.

“It’s about being where people already are rather than just mass marketing,” Magnuson said.

The company will set up a system of affiliates who will receive promotional codes for discounts that they can pass on to their social circles. When the promotion codes are used, the affiliates will receive a cut of the action. It sounds a bit basic, but it also sounds like it could be a stroke of genius. College kids, PTAs, fraternal organizations and the like could be set up as affiliates to help drive business to hotels listed on the GHE. The news release stated part of the company’s marketing effort will be direct Internet distribution through Google, Rate Tiger, Yahoo, Bing, Facebook, Twitter, EBay, Craigslist, U.S. state and city convention/visitor sites and a worldwide network of social, military, educational, religious and fraternal organizations. The SMERF business could be the hidden gem in the entire plan.

Undoubtedly the company has to prove itself. It has to prove that it has a platform that is reliable, secure and capable of handling everything thrown at it. Time will tell if it’s up to the task, but at least on the surface, the Global Hotel Exchange looks to be at least a viable starting point for hotel operators looking for an inexpensive online portal to potentially drive business to their properties. That’s music to their ears.

The opinions expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Bloggers published on this site are given the freedom to express views that may be controversial, but our goal is to provoke thought and constructive discussion within our reader community. Please feel free to comment or contact an editor with any questions or concerns.



Bookmark and Share


1 Comments
Show All

02 November 2011 at 2:10 PM Central Time
In response to: Global Hotel Exchange's intriguing possibilities
RobertKCole commented:
Here's a copy of my comment regarding GHX that was posted on the Travolution blog: A lovely concept, but I am highly skeptical for six reasons: 1) Consumer Booking Fee Tolerance. When airlines eliminated commissions to Online Travel Agencies, the OTAs assessed booking fees for airline tickets, consumers rejected the model, diverting bookings to the carrier websites. As a result, the OTAs pretty much eliminated the booking fees (for example on all round-trip, single-carrier flights.) OTAs receive a portion of the GDS segment fee revenue paid by carriers for airline bookings, but no such fallback position exists for the Global Hotel Exchange. 2) Consumer Value Creation. The proposed model creates supplier value by reducing distribution costs,but as described thus far, it fails to create customer value. Business models that fail to create consumer value have difficulty succeeding. Hotels have entered into price parity agreements with the OTAs and the OTAs have the staffing and technology available to aggressively monitor compliance. For stand-alone hotel bookings, GHE can't undercut the pricing provided to OTAs or the supplier websites - especially by using promotional codes that will reportedly be offered to affiliates. The "market based pricing" described as a competitive advantage is not groundbreaking and alone does not represent sufficient benefit to drive conversion (ask the Farecast team.) 3) Traveler Awareness. Launching a viable competitor to the Online Travel Agencies for hotels will not be an inexpensive marketing task. While I am sure the group will rely heavily on SEO-boosting backlinks from the hoteliers, at $3.00/booking, there will not be much funding available to gain awareness of the site across the global traveling public. The hotel companies that founded the reborn TravelWeb in 2002 can undoubtedly attest that competing against aggregated sector marketing budgets in the hundreds of millions is a daunting challenge. TravelWeb also garnered a considerable amount of its traffic through an exclusive distribution deal with Orbitz, who funded the consumer advertising initiatives. At $3.00 per booking, there is precious little funding available to motivate an affiliate or distribution partner under a revenue share. 4) Technological Sophistication. Creating globally scalable, high availability, real time transaction processing platforms is not easy or cheap. Creating an innovative user interface that delights and engages travelers to drive hotel booking conversion is not something to be taken lightly either - especially when needing to deal with a variety of form factors. Using an extranet for inventory and rate updates is labor intensive for the hoteliers and inhibits access to last room availability and spot pricing promotions. Any distribution partnerships will require the development and maintenance of interfaces. There is no financial incentive for the partners to fund technical development, so the cost will need to be borne by GHE. 5) Industry support. The concept is controlled by the CEO of Magnuson Hotels a group that represents 2,000 independent hotels. Despite the lure of significant reductions in distribution costs, it is unlikely that major global hotel brands will be interested in supporting a platform that is managed via extranet and provides comprehensive forward looking pricing and inventory information to a competitor. large hotel groups may like the idea, but would strongly prefer an industry consortia or neutral non-profit organization tasked with protecting their rate/inventory content and customer information. To be successful one would think that at a minimum, a majority of the following groups would need to be actively participating: Accor, Best Western, Carlson, Choice, Hilton, Hyatt, InterContinental, Marriott, Starwood, Wyndham. Without brands that are recognizable to consumers,broad awareness and word of mouth promotion are unlikely. 6) Funding. To support the busin



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)

Comments that include links or URLs will be removed to avoid instances of spam. Also, comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.



Follow HotelNewsNow.com on Twitter Subscribe to the HotelNewsNow.com RSS Feed Connect with HotelNewsNow.com on LinkedIn