2012
May
April
March
Febuary
January
2011
2010
2009
2008

Jeff Higley
Editorial Director


Patrick Mayock
News Editor-International


Jan Freitag
Senior VP, Global Development, STR


Shawn A. Turner
Finance Editor


Jason Q. Freed
News Editor-Americas



Samantha Worgull
Editorial Assistant


David Grossniklaus
STR Global Writer & Analyst


The Lobby a social network from HotelNewsNow.com
Wednesday, 11 February 2009



Leaders face off
Posted by Patrick Mayock at 12:00 AM

When CEOs of the past, present and future gathered for a Jeopardy-style hotel trivia game on the last day of ALIS, it was only a matter of time before things got a little bit chippy.

“They’re old. They don’t need that much help,” Carlson’s Nancy Johnson quipped playfully after insinuating that the buzzers were rigged in favor of the elder statesmen of the bunch.  Appropriately dubbed, “Old Guys rule!” (aka retired CEOs) the duo in question comprised FelCor’s Tom Corcoran and Don Landry, formerly of Sunburst Hospitality. They were up by a few hundred points at this point and were on their way to a rather decisive victory over teams “The boss” (aka current CEOs) and “Wannabe CEOs” (aka future CEOs).

But while the one-liners and laughter evoked by long-lost pictures of hotel legends (picture young Horst Schulze with a greasy coiffed ’do in the vein of Elvis) may have dominated the fast-paced, 20-minute game, it wasn’t the answers that revealed much about the contestants—but rather the way they played the game.

Take the Wannabes, for example. Johnson and teammate Jim Anhut of IHG weren’t afraid to take risks, even when their score drifted southward to an embarrassing tally of    -700. By the end of regulation play, they had managed to claw back up to -100, and later finished with 400 after a benevolent Jim Burba, who played host, granted them 500 points to wager on the final question.

The current CEOs, Best Western’s David Kong and Nobel Investment Group ’s Mitesh Shah, played a much more calculated game. They buzzed in when they were certain they knew the answer, and refrained from throwing up Hail Marys for higher-value questions. They finished in second with 900 points after losing 500 points on the final question.

The last group—the aforementioned Old Guys—won handily. Confident and cool, their years in the business proved invaluable when answering history-related questions and those involving famous hotels from around the world. By the end of regulation, they had a 500-point lead with 1,900 points, and would eventually jump to 2,800 after answering the final question correctly.

So after watching them play, what does each team’s respective style of play say about their ability to lead?

I hesitate to draw any definitive conclusions from a 20-minute trivia game, but I couldn’t help ponder how such behavior would transfer to the boardroom:

The Wannabes: not afraid to voice their opinion, even when that meant suggesting a somewhat controversial or alternative approach to a challenge. Ultimately though, they still have a bit to learn.

The Old Guys: Serving in an advisory role, they boast experience in the industry that keeps them confident and cool.

The Bosses: Under the most intense scrutiny, they take a more calculated approach and only act after confirming their decision is correct.

That final question, by the way? Name the hotel in the movie, “The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas.”

Answer:  The Chicken Ranch



Bookmark and Share


0 Comments
Show All



Login
Or enter a name to post your comment:

Post Your Comment

(4000 charcters max)
Protected by FormShield
Refresh
Listen
Please enter the characters shown on the image


Enter the characters you see in the box above, then click submit to post your comment

HotelNewsNow.com encourages reader participation. The opinions expressed in comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of HotelNewsNow.com or its parent company, Smith Travel Research and its affiliated companies. Please report any violations to our editorial staff.

Comments that include profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, solicitations or advertising, or other similarly inappropriate or offensive comments or material will be removed from the site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.